1. ) ACCORD EDGE (M) SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN TEO & CHEW v 1. ) HALAMAN UNGGUL SDN. BHD. 2. ) TIMUR PROPERTY SDN. BHD. (dahulunya dikenali sebagai HALAMAN GROUP DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD.) PENCELAH 1. ) WONG HOW HUA 2. ) EXSIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD

ba-24ncvc-2388-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 February 2026 • BA-24NCvC-2388-10/2025 • 14 min read

11 cases cited (0 SG, 11 foreign)

Catchwords

1. Leave to intervene and be added as a respondent in the interpleader proceedings. 2. Proposed intervener is not a party to the sale and purchase agreement. 3. Proposed intervener is a director and shareholder of the purchaser in the sale and purchase agreement. 4. Proposed intervener is allowed to intervene where his commercial interest is affected. 5. Findings in the originating summons has a direct legal effect on the proposed intervener’s rights and interest.

Judges (1)

Seow Hock Peng Delivered

Counsel (8)

H S Lim & Malik Firm JS Chin & Co. Firm KH Wong & Co Firm Sia Siew Mun Firm Chin Jing Shen Counsel Defendant Emily Chua Yan Feng Counsel Intervener Samuel Lim You En Counsel Plaintiff Sew Chang Peng Counsel Defendant

Parties (6)

ACCORD EDGE Sdn Bhd Applicant EXSIM DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Intervener Halaman Unggul Sdn Bhd Respondent Tetuan Teo & Chew Applicant Timur Property Sdn Bhd Respondent Wong How Hua Intervener

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (11)

MY (11)

[1969] 2 MLJ 52 [1991] 2 MLJ 27 [1992] 1 CLJ 344 [1992] 2 MLJ 63 [1997] 1 MLJ 690 [2012] 6 AMR 124 [2012] 6 MLJ 519 [2020] 1 MLJ 258 [2021] 4 MLJ 323 [2024] MLJU 150 [2025] 8 MLJ 875

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-2388-10-2025)