VINOD A/L REGOOVARAN v REGOOVARAN A/L PARAMU

ba-24ncvc-401-03-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 March 2025 • BA-24NCvC-401-03/2022 • 15 min read

2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

Mental Health Act – section 52-28 – inquiry proceeding - After hearing all parties and upon considering the medical report of Dr Bharathi, I am satisfied that the Defendant suffered an illness of major NCD with behavioural disturbances, including delusions, which had affected his mental capacity in decision making and his executive dysfunction - At the inquiry session, both experts were allowed to counter each other's opinions, and I am of the view that Dr Barathi's explanation outdoes Dr Andrew's - Paragraphs (f), (h) and (i) of the Originating Summons are thereby allowed.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (5)

Mann & Associates Firm Vinod Kamalanathan & Associates Firm Muhammad Azim Akif bin Saiful Bahri Counsel Plaintiff Sivanesan a/l Ramiah Counsel Defendant Vinod Kamalanathan Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

Regoovaran a/l Paramu Respondent Vinod a/l Regoovaran Applicant

Case Significance

VINOD A/L REGOOVARAN v REGOOVARAN A/L PARAMU is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 12, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncvc-401-03-2022). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of VINOD A/L REGOOVARAN v REGOOVARAN A/L PARAMU?

VINOD A/L REGOOVARAN v REGOOVARAN A/L PARAMU is a High Court decision dated March 12, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)

[2003] 4 MLJ 535 [2022] 2 MLJ 950

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-401-03-2022)