JAGADESH ROA A/L SUBRAMANIAM v WAKIL DIRI KEPADA HARTA PUSAKA KANIAH A/L LEDHUMANAN (SIMATI) PENCELAH KALAISELVI A/P SHANMUGAM

ba-24ncvc-500-03-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 July 2025 • BA-24NCvC-500-03/2024 • 8 min read
4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Permohonan Interlokutori: Permohonan oleh pencelah yang dicadangkan untuk mencelah dalam prosiding Saman Pemula plaintif terhadap defendan supaya perintah jualan bertarikh 9 September 2024 digantung sementara menunggu keputusan Mahkamah Sesyen Petaling Jaya untuk mengenepikan perintah persetujuan bertarikh 7 Ogos 2023 yang dikatakan diperolehi secara menyalahi undang-undang dan frod – Sama ada pihak pencelah yang dicadangkan mempunyai hak untuk mencelah – Sama ada terdapat keadaan-keadaan khas yang membolehkan perintah Mahkamah di sini digantung – Aturan 15 Kaedah 6 dan Aturan 55 Kaedah 16 Kaedah-kaedah Mahkamah 2012.

Judges (1)

Hazizah binti Kassim Delivered

Counsel (7)

Mann & Associates Firm Mas Kumar Firm Rajo & Associates Firm Naveen Chendra Bose Counsel Intervener Pramjit Kaur Counsel Plaintiff Vijaya Kumar Counsel Defendant Vijayaletchmy Counsel Intervener

Parties (3)

Jagadesh Roa a/l Subramaniam Applicant Kalaiselvi a/p Shanmugam Intervener Wakil Diri Kepada Harta Pusaka Kaniah a/l Ledhumanan Respondent

Case Significance

JAGADESH ROA A/L SUBRAMANIAM v WAKIL DIRI KEPADA HARTA PUSAKA KANIAH A/L LEDH... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 28, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncvc-500-03-2024). The case was decided by Hazizah binti Kassim.

What was the outcome of JAGADESH ROA A/L SUBRAMANIAM v WAKIL DIRI KEPADA HARTA PUSAKA KANIAH A/L LEDH...?

JAGADESH ROA A/L SUBRAMANIAM v WAKIL DIRI KEPADA HARTA PUSAKA KANIAH A/L LEDH... is a High Court decision dated July 28, 2025. The case was heard by Hazizah binti Kassim. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)
[2004] 1 CLJ 239 [2004] 1 MLJ 257 [2008] 2 CLJ 121 [2019] 7 CLJ 444

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-500-03-2024)