HORSEDALE DEVELOPMENT BERHAD v 1. ) PROLANDER SDN BHD 2. ) NOR AZLINDA BINTI ABDUL AZIZ 3. ) SOLHA BINTI MOHD YUSOFF 4. ) JAMALUDDIN BIN THAMBYCHIK 5. ) ROHAIZAL BIN IDRIS 6. ) PETRON MALAYSIA REFINING & MARKETING BERHAD (DAHULU DIKENALI SEBAGAI ESSO MALAYSIA BERHAD)

ba-24ncvc-761-04-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 March 2026 • BA-24NCvC-761-04/2023

Catchwords

1. Striking out of the Plaintiff’s amended originating summons. 2. First Defendant struck off from the official register of companies. 3. Plaintiff applies to terminate the lease as a consequent to the First Defendant being dissolved. 4. First Defendant has been subsequently reinstated. 5. Effect of Section 555(3) Companies Act 2016. 6. Reinstatement does not relate to consequential effect and validity of leases and sub-leases. 7. Section 555(3) does not extend to retrospectively cover transactions and contracts entered into during the material period which the company has been struck off.

Judges (1)

Seow Hock Peng Delivered

Parties (7)

HORSEDALE DEVELOPMENT BERHAD Applicant PETRON MALAYSIA REFINING & MARKETING BERHAD (DAHULU DIKENALI SEBAGAI ESSO MALAYSIA BERHAD) Respondent PROLANDER Sdn Bhd Respondent Jamaluddin bin Thambychik Respondent Nor Azlinda binti Abdul Aziz Respondent Rohaizal bin Idris Respondent Solha binti Mohd Yusoff Respondent

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-761-04-2023)