AIDIL BIN ABAS v 1. ) XXXX 2. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN 3. ) Ketua Polis Negara 4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

ba-25-34-03-2019 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 April 2026 • BA-25-34-03/2019 • 6 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

When the Applicant's judicial review proceedings against his dismissal was allowed, it included an order for the Respondent to hold an inquiry to determine salaries and other benefits due to him. Based on this prayer, the Applicant filed an application for assessment of damages. The Court is satisfied that the prayer does not constitute a judgment for damages to be assessed. The relief is an administrative direction given to the Respondents to compute monies due to the Applicant from the date of his dismissal to his reinstatement. The application was struck out.

Judges (1)

Narkunavathy Sundareson Delivered

Counsel (4)

Jabatan Peguam Negara Firm Mohaji Hazury & Ismail Firm Muhammad Hadi Nafiz Mohammad Din Counsel Applicant Sheryn Yong Shi Yee Counsel Respondent

Parties (4)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent Ketua Polis Negara Respondent LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN Respondent Aidil bin Abas Applicant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[1997] 2 MLJ 565 [1997] 3 AMR 2458 [1997] 3 CLJ 305

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-25-34-03-2019)