ERAKA NAIDU A/L SANNACY v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya

ba-25-59-07-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 September 2025 • BA-25-59-07/2025 • 4 min read

5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

Prayer 2 in Enclosure 1 is the Applicant’s application for a stay of any action by the Respondent to demolish the guard house and boom gate in the Residential Area pending the disposal of the Applicant’s substantive application for judicial review. The Applicant failed to discharge the onus on them to show special circumstances that warrant a stay. The application is without merit.

Judges (1)

Narkunavathy Sundareson Delivered

Counsel (5)

Manjit Singh Sachdev Mohammad Radzi & Partners Firm Surendra Ananth Firm Gary Au Kar Meng Counsel Respondent Surendra Ananth Counsel Applicant Tan Weng Hung Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya Respondent Eraka Naidu a/l Sannacy Applicant

Case Significance

ERAKA NAIDU A/L SANNACY v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 22, 2025 (citation: ba-25-59-07-2025). The case was decided by Narkunavathy Sundareson.

What was the outcome of ERAKA NAIDU A/L SANNACY v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya?

ERAKA NAIDU A/L SANNACY v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya is a High Court decision dated September 22, 2025. The case was heard by Narkunavathy Sundareson. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)

[1998] 3 CLJ 85 [2003] 1 CLJ 210 [2003] 4 CLJ 1 [2004] 1 MLJ 257 [2010] 8 CLJ 173

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-25-59-07-2025)