1. ) SHINY RESOURCES SDN. BHD. 2. ) PRISTANA HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 3. ) MASTER EXPRESS TRAVELS & TOURS SDN. BHD. 4. ) G.B. RESOURCES SDN. BHD. 5. ) VILLA CERIA SDN. BHD. 6. ) PUNCAK PURNAMA SDN. BHD. 7. ) SEWANG MURNI SDN. BHD. 8. ) KIMIX CONCRETE SDN. BHD. 9. ) DARULVEST SDN. BHD. 10. ) SEGAMAN MAKMUR SDN.BHD. 11. ) LEE CHIT WAI 12. ) ONG PENG LIAN 13. ) ONG YING MI (Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ong Leong Kheng, simati) 14. ) ZESTRA INDUSTRY SDN. BHD. 15. ) BENUA MUHIBAH SDN. BHD. 16. ) PRIDE...

ba-25-82-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 19 February 2026 • BA-25-82-10/2025 • 2 min read

Catchwords

Application for leave to commence judicial review application to challenge the decision of the First Respondent’s decision rejecting their applications to be alienated lands AG objected to the application on the following grounds - (i) Applicant 13 did not have the locus standi to file this application as she was not a TOL holder nor had she applied to the Lands to be alienated to her; (ii) Applicants 1, 2, 3 and 20 did not have the locus standi to file this application as they were not aggrieved by the Rejection Letters because it was not addressed to them; (iii) Applicant 14 did not have the locus standi because their application for the Lands to be alienated to them was still in consideration and had not been rejected; (iv) Enclosure 1 was filed outside the prescribed time frame; (v) Enclosure 1 was vexatious and frivolous as the Applicants failed to make full and frank disclosure, there were no grounds to challenge the Notices and their application for an order of mandamus was flawed. AG's objections were allowed and the Applicants' application for leave was dismissed.

Judges (1)

Narkunavathy Sundareson Delivered

Parties (22)

AGAVIC TRADING Sdn Bhd Applicant ANCHOR TRANSPORT Sdn Bhd Applicant BENUA MUHIBAH Sdn Bhd Applicant DARULVEST Sdn Bhd Applicant G.B. RESOURCES Sdn Bhd Applicant KIMIX CONCRETE Sdn Bhd Applicant Kerajaan Negeri Selangor Respondent MASTER EXPRESS TRAVELS & TOURS Sdn Bhd Applicant NEW ZENITH EDGE Sdn Bhd Applicant PRIDE DOMAIN Sdn Bhd Applicant PRISTANA HOLDINGS Sdn Bhd Applicant PUNCAK PURNAMA Sdn Bhd Applicant Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Klang Respondent SEGAMAN MAKMUR Sdn Bhd Applicant SEWANG MURNI Sdn Bhd Applicant SHINY RESOURCES Sdn Bhd Applicant STRONG COHESION Sdn Bhd Applicant VILLA CERIA Sdn Bhd Applicant ZESTRA INDUSTRY Sdn Bhd Applicant Lee Chit Wai Applicant Ong Peng Lian Applicant Ong Ying Mi Applicant

Case Significance

1. ) SHINY RESOURCES SDN. BHD. 2. ) PRISTANA HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 3. ) MASTER E... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 19, 2026 (citation: ba-25-82-10-2025). The case was decided by Narkunavathy Sundareson.

Key issues: (i) Applicant 13 did not have the locus standi to file this application as she was not a TOL holder nor had she applied to the Lands to be alienated to her;.

What was the outcome of 1. ) SHINY RESOURCES SDN. BHD. 2. ) PRISTANA HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 3. ) MASTER E...?

1. ) SHINY RESOURCES SDN. BHD. 2. ) PRISTANA HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 3. ) MASTER E... is a High Court decision dated February 19, 2026. The case was heard by Narkunavathy Sundareson. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-25-82-10-2025)