DATUK WIRA TAN BEE GEOK v SUNIMAX DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD PENCELAH DATO' SERI THAI KIM SIM PIHAK TERKILAN SENZEN MASTERY SDN BHD

ba-28ncc-555-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 March 2026 • BA-28NCC-555-09/2024

Catchwords

Winding Up – Petition – Application to Intervene – Application to stay winding up proceeding pending resolution of the matrimonial proceedings and alleged shareholder deadlock – Whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for intervention under Order 92 rule 4 Rules of Court 2012 – Whether the Applicant has locus standi to intervene in the winding up proceedings – Whether there are special circumstances warranting a stay of the winding up proceedings – Whether the Respondent is unable to pay its debts – Matrimonial dispute in separate forum does not constitute special circumstances – Right to participate in winding up petition are creditors, contributories and company itself – Company is a separate legal entity – No leave was obtained - Section 347 and 465(1)(e) of Companies Act 2016 – Rule 194 of Companies (Winding Up) Rules 1972 - Order 92 rule 4 Rules of Court 2012

Judges (1)

Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran Delivered

Parties (4)

SENZEN MASTERY Sdn Bhd Aggrieved Party SUNIMAX DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Respondent Dato Seri Thai Kim Sim Intervener Datuk Wira Tan Bee Geok Petitioner

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-28ncc-555-09-2024)