GRAND WELLNESS HUB SDN. BHD v MINES WATERFRONT BUSINESS PARK SDN. BHD. PENCELAH 1. ) LING HOW GIN 2. ) YAP CHYE CHEEY 3. ) JOGINDAR SINGH A/L SARDARA SINGH 4. ) ORALIX MARKETING SDN BHD

ba-28pw-260-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 24 March 2025 • BA-28PW-260-09/2024

Catchwords

Post Winding Up - Whether the propsed interveners have a sufficient legal interest in the subject matter of these proceedings such that they ought to be allowed to intervene - Creditors has direct interest in the administration and conclusion of winding up - Whether the proposed intervener's debts have been formally admitted by the liquidators does not conclusively determin their entitlement to partipate in proceedings - Court to consider the satisfaction of creditor's debts. agreement of creditors and conduct of winding up in determining whether to allowe a termination - Absence of any objection from liquidator - Order 15 Rule 6 Rules of Court 2012 - Order 92 Rules of Court 2012 - Section 517 Companies Act 2016

Judges (1)

Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran Delivered

Parties (6)

GRAND WELLNESS HUB Sdn Bhd Applicant MINES WATERFRONT BUSINESS PARK Sdn Bhd Respondent ORALIX MARKETING Sdn Bhd Intervener Jogindar Singh a/l Sardara Singh Intervener Ling How Gin Intervener Yap Chye Cheey Intervener

Case Significance

GRAND WELLNESS HUB SDN. BHD v MINES WATERFRONT BUSINESS PARK SDN. BHD. PENCEL... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 24, 2025 (citation: ba-28pw-260-09-2024). The case was decided by Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran.

What was the outcome of GRAND WELLNESS HUB SDN. BHD v MINES WATERFRONT BUSINESS PARK SDN. BHD. PENCEL...?

GRAND WELLNESS HUB SDN. BHD v MINES WATERFRONT BUSINESS PARK SDN. BHD. PENCEL... is a High Court decision dated March 24, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Rozela binti Raja Toran. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-28pw-260-09-2024)