LAW MAY HUI@JULIET v TEE KEN PING

ba-37ws-40-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 May 2025 • BA-37WS-40-12/2024 • 15 min read

8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Catchwords

Tatacara Sivil: Penggantungan Pelaksanaan Perintah Penjualan dan Penyitaan Rumah – Rayuan ke Mahkamah Rayuan – Sama ada wujud keadaan khas – Sama ada hak Plaintif untuk meneruskan pelaksanaan demi menikmati hasil litigasinya atau hak Defendan untuk mempertahankan kediaman mereka – A. 45 dan A. 55 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 − Kuasa budi bicara Mahkamah dijalankan judiciously − Petisyen perceraian yang difailkan belum dilupuskan − Bukan melibatkan soal kewangan semata-mata tetapi kehilangan harta perkahwinan dan keselesaan tempat tinggal anak-anak perkahwinan yang tidak dapat diukur dengan wang dan pampasan.

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (4)

ADLIZA SUBRA SITI & PARTNERS Firm ADRIAN, SYUHADA, SIA & ASSOCIATES Firm Jeff Sia Chong Seng Counsel Respondent Subramaniam a/l Paramasivam Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

Law May Hui@juliet Plaintiff Tee Ken Ping Defendant

Case Significance

LAW MAY HUI@JULIET v TEE KEN PING is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 20, 2025 (citation: ba-37ws-40-12-2024). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of LAW MAY HUI@JULIET v TEE KEN PING?

LAW MAY HUI@JULIET v TEE KEN PING is a High Court decision dated May 20, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (8)

MY (8)

[1995] 3 MLJ 224 [2000] 5 MLJ 391 [2002] 3 CLJ 3803 [2004] 1 CLJ 2394 [2012] 5 MLRH 252 [2012] 9 MLJ 779 [2013] 4 CLJ 579 [2022] 6 MLJ 58

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-37ws-40-12-2024)