FOO YOKE KEONG v 1. ) TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI 2. ) PENGUASA, PUSAT PEMULIHAN AKHLAK SIMPANG RENGGAM, JOHOR 3. ) KERAJAAN MALAYSIA

ba-44-63-03-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 24 September 2025 • BA-44-63-03/2025 • 22 min read

5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

Permohonan Habeas Corpus – Akta Dadah Berbahaya (Langkah-Langkah Pencegahan Khas) 1985 - sama ada terdapat ketidakpatuhan prosedur mandatori – sama ada Perintah Tahanan dikeluarkan bercanggah dengan Perkara 149 Perlembagaan Persekutuan - sama ada percanggahan catatan bahasa terjemahan yang digunakan melanggar prosedur mandatori - sama ada terdapat kelewatan TMDN mengeluarkan Perintah Tahanan di bawah seksyen 6 (1) Akta.

Judges (1)

Roszianayati binti Ahmad Delivered

Counsel (4)

M. Thanakumaran & Shan Firm Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Kementerian Dalam Negeri Firm Nur Syahidah binti Mohamad Kamil Counsel Respondent Shanmugam Ganesan Counsel Applicant

Parties (4)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent Penguasa, Pusat Pemulihan Akhlak Simpang Renggam, Johor Respondent TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI Respondent Foo Yoke Keong Applicant

Case Significance

FOO YOKE KEONG v 1. ) TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI 2. ) PENGUASA, PUSAT PEMU... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 24, 2025 (citation: ba-44-63-03-2025). The case was decided by Roszianayati binti Ahmad.

What was the outcome of FOO YOKE KEONG v 1. ) TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI 2. ) PENGUASA, PUSAT PEMU...?

FOO YOKE KEONG v 1. ) TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI 2. ) PENGUASA, PUSAT PEMU... is a High Court decision dated September 24, 2025. The case was heard by Roszianayati binti Ahmad. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)

[1960] 1 MLJ 184 [1994] 4 CLJ 47 [2005] 3 CLJ 914 [2009] 6 CLJ 705 [2021] 2 CLJ 29

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-44-63-03-2025)