PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MOHAMAD AMINUDDIN BIN MD ARIFFIN 2. ) FIQRI MUSTAQIM BIN ZAKARIA

ba-45a-132-09-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 October 2025 • BA-45A-132-09/2022 • 47 min read
21 cases cited (0 SG, 21 foreign)

Catchwords

Undang-undang Jenayah- dadah berbahaya- pemilikan- tertuduh 1 dan 2 telah mengedar dadah berbahaya - sama ada pendakwaan berjaya membuktikan kes prima facie- sama ada pembelaan berjaya menimbulkan keraguan mengenai dadah yang dijumpai dalam bonet kereta- sama ada pembelaan gagal mematahkan anggapan seksyen 37(da) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - sama ada sabitan adalah selamat

Judges (1)

Hazlina binti Hussain Delivered

Counsel (3)

Azamuddin bin Ab Aziz Counsel Accused Azizul Shariman bin Yusof Counsel Accused Mohd Firdaous bin Mohamed Idris Counsel Prosecution

Parties (3)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Fiqri Mustaqim bin Zakaria Accused Mohamad Aminuddin bin Md Ariffin Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MOHAMAD AMINUDDIN BIN MD ARIFFIN 2.... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 20, 2025 (citation: ba-45a-132-09-2022). The case was decided by Hazlina binti Hussain.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MOHAMAD AMINUDDIN BIN MD ARIFFIN 2....?

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MOHAMAD AMINUDDIN BIN MD ARIFFIN 2.... is a High Court decision dated October 20, 2025. The case was heard by Hazlina binti Hussain. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)
Penal Code (Cap 574)

Cases Cited (21)

UK (1)
[1968] 2 All ER 356
MY (20)
[1956] 22 MLJ 237 [1963] 1 MLJ 263 [1963] MLJ 263 [1982] 1 MLJ 132 [1982] CLJ 188 [1982] CLJ 340 [1987] 1 CLJ 540 [1987] 2 MLJ 336 [2003] 1 CLJ 734 [2005] 1 CLJ 85 [2005] 2 MLJ 301 [2006] 1 CLJ 457 [2007] 5 MLJ 1 [2010] 1 CLJ 17 [2013] 3 MLJ 481 [2013] 6 MLJ 86 [2014] 3 CLJ 584 [2015] 2 CLJ 145 [2018] 6 CLJ 133 [2022] 3 CLJ 543

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-45a-132-09-2022)