PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MUZAFFAR BIN ZAABA 2. ) CHE HASMIDI BIN CHE HASSAN

ba-45a-148-10-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 2 June 2025 • BA-45A-148-10/2022 • 37 min read

12 cases cited (0 SG, 12 foreign)

Catchwords

Seksyen 39B ADB 1952-beban pembuktian di peringkat pembelaan-keraguan munasabah mestilah berdasarkan pada bukti dan bukan imaginasi atau sangkaan-keraguan terhadap lokasi dadah dijumpai-kecacatan pada borang geledah-milikan eksklusif dadah-

Judges (1)

Latifah binti Haji Mohd Tahar Delivered

Counsel (5)

Jayamurugan Vadivelu & Partners Firm Salehuddin Saidin & Associates Firm Jayamurugan s/o Vadivelu Counsel Accused Mohammed Heikal bin Ismail Counsel Prosecution Muhammad Hafizuddin bin Salehuddin Counsel Accused

Parties (3)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Che Hasmidi bin Che Hassan Accused Muzaffar bin Zaaba Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MUZAFFAR BIN ZAABA 2. ) CHE HASMIDI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 2, 2025 (citation: ba-45a-148-10-2022). The case was decided by Latifah binti Haji Mohd Tahar.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MUZAFFAR BIN ZAABA 2. ) CHE HASMIDI...?

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) MUZAFFAR BIN ZAABA 2. ) CHE HASMIDI... is a High Court decision dated June 2, 2025. The case was heard by Latifah binti Haji Mohd Tahar. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (12)

MY (12)

[1963] 29 MLJ 263 [1966] 1 MLJ 197 [1971] 2 MLJ 16 [1981] 1 MLJ 64 [1988] 1 CLJ 283 [1994] 4 CLJ 209 [2002] 3 MLJ 291 [2002] 5 MLJ 406 [2003] 2 MLJ 241 [2004] 4 MLJ 489 [2006] 6 CLJ 379 [2016] 6 MLJ 277

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-45a-148-10-2022)