PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH NGOOI ESING

ba-45a-61-03-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 November 2025 • BA-45A-61-03/2022 • 45 min read
14 cases cited (0 SG, 14 foreign)

Catchwords

Undang-undang jenayah-dadah berbahaya-seksyen 39B Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952- sama ada elemen pemilikan dan pengedaran secara langsung berjaya dibuktikan-sama ada kegagalan memberikan kata-kata amaran sebelum acupakai dilaksanakan menjejaskan hak tertuduh-sama ada pembelaan "innocent carrier" relevan-sama ada kata-kata amaran telah diberikan secara efektif dan berkesan-sama ada rampasan telefon bimbit yang tidak dibuat semasa serbuan dan tidak ada borang geledah dan tandatangan tertuduh adalah fatal-sama ada pendakwaan berjaya membuktikan kes prima facie-tertuduh dilepas dan dibebaskan tanpa dipanggil untuk membela diri

Judges (1)

Hazlina binti Hussain Delivered

Counsel (3)

Amirul Ridzuan bin Dato' Hanif Counsel Accused Mohd Firdaous bin Mohamed Idris Counsel Prosecution Nur Syafiah Athirah Counsel Accused

Parties (2)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Ngooi Esing Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH NGOOI ESING is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 13, 2025 (citation: ba-45a-61-03-2022). The case was decided by Hazlina binti Hussain.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH NGOOI ESING?

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH NGOOI ESING is a High Court decision dated November 13, 2025. The case was heard by Hazlina binti Hussain. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)

Cases Cited (14)

MY (14)
[1962] MLJ 257 [1963] MLJ 263 [2000] 6 MLJ 705 [2002] 2 MLJ 408 [2003] 1 CLJ 734 [2005] 1 CLJ 85 [2005] 2 AMR 750 [2005] 2 MLJ 301 [2006] 1 CLJ 457 [2014] 2 MLJ 652 [2021] 4 MLJ 677 [2022] 4 CLJ 1 [2022] MLJU 160 [2023] MLJU 1465

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-45a-61-03-2022)