AMIT CHHABRA A/L ASHOK KUMAR CHHABRA v 1. ) ANURADHA A/P KODIVAL @ KODIVEL 2. ) RAVENA RAJ KUMAR 3. ) MYTHRINA RAJ KUMAR 4. ) TETUAN A.G. ROSELI & PAUL

bl-22ncvc-12-04-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 6 March 2025 • BL-22NCvC-12-04/2023 • 7 min read

7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

-Seseorang Hakim apabila mendengar permohonan injunksi interparte hendaklah bertanyakan soalan ini iaitu “ whether the totality of the facts presented before him disclosed a bona fide serious issues to be tried”. - Kedua-dua versi yang di nyatakan didalam afidavit Plaintif dan Defendan keempat hendaklah diuji didalam perbicaraan penuh agar Mahkamah dapat memutuskan versi mana yang dapat dibuktikan atas imbangan kebarangkalian untuk diterima.

Judges (1)

Norliza binti Othman Delivered

Parties (5)

TETUAN A.G. ROSELI & PAUL Defendant Amit Chhabra a/l Ashok Kumar Chhabra Plaintiff Anuradha a/p Kodival @ Kodivel Defendant Mythrina Raj Kumar Defendant Ravena Raj Kumar Defendant

Case Significance

AMIT CHHABRA A/L ASHOK KUMAR CHHABRA v 1. ) ANURADHA A/P KODIVAL @ KODIVEL 2.... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 6, 2025 (citation: bl-22ncvc-12-04-2023). The case was decided by Norliza binti Othman.

What was the outcome of AMIT CHHABRA A/L ASHOK KUMAR CHHABRA v 1. ) ANURADHA A/P KODIVAL @ KODIVEL 2....?

AMIT CHHABRA A/L ASHOK KUMAR CHHABRA v 1. ) ANURADHA A/P KODIVAL @ KODIVEL 2.... is a High Court decision dated March 6, 2025. The case was heard by Norliza binti Othman. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)

[1996] 3 MLJ 597 [1997] 1 CLJ 70 [2002] 3 AMR 2867 [2002] 3 CLJ 380 [2002] 3 MLJ 49 [2004] 1 MLJ 257 [2013] 4 MLJ 213

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (bl-22ncvc-12-04-2023)