PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH SARAVANAN A/L MUNIANDY

ca-45a-8-12-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 April 2025 • CA-45A-8-12/2020

Catchwords

Jenayah Narkotik — Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 — Pembuktian milikan berdasarkan keterangan terus bukan menggunapakai andaian menurut s. 37 (d) ADB dan s. 37 (da) ADB — Sama ada anggapan di bawah s 37(da) boleh diguna tanpa dapatan milikan secara afirmatif - Pihak Pendakwaan perlu membuktikan elemen milikan dan pengetahuan tanpa apa-apa keraguan munasabah sebelum boleh menggunapakai anggapan mengedar di bawah s.37(da)(iiia) ADB.Keterangan — Kawalan berterusan terhadap kenderaan — Kewujudan cap jari pihak ketiga — Sama ada wujud dapatan positif milikan secara eksklusif (express affirmative finding) — Muhammad Hassan v PP [1998] 2 CLJ 170; Alma Nudo Atenza v PP [2019] 5 CLJ 780; PP v Lingeswaran [2018] 10 MLJ 158 Prinsip penghukuman — Pengakuan salah selepas kes Pendakwaan ditutup — Kepentingan awam, keseriusan kesalahan, berat dan jenis dadah — Hukuman penjara serentak dan sebatan.

Judges (1)

Mohd Radzi bin Harun Delivered

Parties (2)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Saravanan a/l Muniandy Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH SARAVANAN A/L M... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 16, 2025 (citation: ca-45a-8-12-2020). The case was decided by Mohd Radzi bin Harun.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH SARAVANAN A/L M...?

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH SARAVANAN A/L M... is a High Court decision dated April 16, 2025. The case was heard by Mohd Radzi bin Harun. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ca-45a-8-12-2020)