PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] TERTUDUH PANG SIAT FUI

cb-45b-1-03-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 January 2026 • CB-45B-1-03/2021 • 50 min read

31 cases cited (0 SG, 31 foreign)

Catchwords

Perbicaraan jenayah - OKT dituduh melakukan kesalahan bunuh - OKT dipanggil membela diri dan mengemukakan pengecualian di bawah seksyen 84 Kanun Keseksaan - Mahkamah berpuas hati OKT berjaya membuktikan pengecualian di bawah seksyen 84 Kanun Keseksaan - Perintah di bawah seksyen 347 KPJ.

Judges (1)

Roslan bin Mat Nor Delivered

Counsel (4)

Bong & Co Firm Intan Nor Hilwani binti Mat Rifin Counsel Prosecution Ivan Bong Counsel Accused Richard Bong Counsel Accused

Parties (2)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Pang Siat Fui Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Neg... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 25, 2026 (citation: cb-45b-1-03-2021). <p>The accused was charged with murder for stabbing a man to death in Raub and immediately reported to the police. The court accepted the defence of unsoundness of mind under s.84 Penal Code, supported by a forensic psychiatric report diagnosing schizophrenia. He was acquitted on grounds of insanity and ordered detained in a safe place under s.347 CPC.</p> The case was decided by Roslan bin Mat Nor. Counsel appearing: Intan Nor Hilwani binti Mat Rifin (prosecution counsel), Ivan Bong (counsel accused), Richard Bong (counsel accused).

Summary

The accused was charged with murder for stabbing a man to death in Raub and immediately reported to the police. The court accepted the defence of unsoundness of mind under s.84 Penal Code, supported by a forensic psychiatric report diagnosing schizophrenia. He was acquitted on grounds of insanity and ordered detained in a safe place under s.347 CPC.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Neg...?

<p>The accused was charged with murder for stabbing a man to death in Raub and immediately reported to the police. The court accepted the defence of u...

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

s 105

Penal Code (Cap 574)

s 84

Cases Cited (31)

UK (2)

[1956] 3 All ER 249 [2022] 4 WLR 41

MY (29)

[1960] 26 MLJ 249 [1970] 1 MLJ 63 [1977] 1 MLJ 6 [1993] 1 CLJ 147 [1994] 4 CLJ 464 [1997] 3 MLJ 495 [1998] 1 CLJ 759 [1998] 2 CLJ 383 [1998] 4 CLJ 209 [1998] 6 MLJ 678 [1999] 4 CLJ 215 [1999] 4 MLJ 497 [2002] 5 MLJ 233 [2004] 1 CLJ 378 [2005] 2 CLJ 826 [2005] 7 CLJ 218 [2006] 3 AMR 524 [2006] 8 CLJ 462 [2007] 2 CLJ 509 [2007] 7 MLJ 206 [2008] 7 CLJ 168 [2017] 7 CLJ 273 [2019] 6 MLJ 542 [2020] 6 MLJ 727 [2022] MLJU 1690 [2023] 4 MLJ 929 [2023] MLJU 1352 [2025] 1 MLJ 50 [2026] 1 CLJ 419

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (cb-45b-1-03-2021)