1. ) MOHAMMAD HAFIZI BIN BAHARI 2. ) XXXX v 1. ) PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO BERHAD 2. ) Thanabalan A/l M Rajamanickam

j-04im-579-12-2022 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 9 March 2025 • J-04(IM)-579-12/2022 • 3 min read

Catchwords

Section 96(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 - lnsurer's Statutory Liability - lnterlocutory Judgment in Default was entered by the Sessions Court against the Defendants and the Plaintiffs proceeded with the assessment of damages - Plaintiffs filed Revovery Action against the P&O Insurance - The P&O lnsurance filed an application to intervene and to set aside the order of the Sessions Court - Whether P&O lnsurance should be allowed to intervene - Whether the Sessions Court is functus officio - Whether the P&O lnsurance abuse the court process.

Judges (3)

Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid Delivered Choo Kah Sing Coram Ravinthran a/l Paramaguru Coram

Parties (4)

PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO. BERHAD Respondent Mohammad Hafizi bin Bahari Appellant Thanabalan a/l M Rajamanickam Respondent Xxxx Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) MOHAMMAD HAFIZI BIN BAHARI 2. ) XXXX v 1. ) PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE C... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated March 9, 2025 (citation: j-04im-579-12-2022). The panel comprised Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid, Choo Kah Sing and Ravinthran a/l Paramaguru, with Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of 1. ) MOHAMMAD HAFIZI BIN BAHARI 2. ) XXXX v 1. ) PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE C...?

1. ) MOHAMMAD HAFIZI BIN BAHARI 2. ) XXXX v 1. ) PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE C... is a Court of Appeal decision dated March 9, 2025. The case was heard by Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (j-04im-579-12-2022)