SKYTECH SYNERGY SDN BHD v LOW HUI PING

ja-12ancvc-15-07-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 January 2025 • JA-12ANCvC-15-07/2024 • 7 min read

Catchwords

The Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal and affirmed the Sessions Court’s order dated 27.6.2024 made pursuant to Order 18 Rule 19 and/or Order 92 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court 2012. The Court found that D1 did not act in her personal capacity but as Chairman of D2, a registered society. Applying the doctrine of privity of contract and section 9(c) of the Societies Act 1966, there was no cause of action against D1. The Writ of Summon and Statement of Claim against D1 was set aside.

Judges (1)

Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor Delivered

Counsel (4)

Ang Chambers Firm Benjamin Poh Law Office Firm Freda Josephine Gonzales Counsel Respondent Poh Chee Seng Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

SKYTECH SYNERGY Sdn Bhd Appellant Low Hui Ping Respondent

Case Significance

SKYTECH SYNERGY SDN BHD v LOW HUI PING is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 16, 2025 (citation: ja-12ancvc-15-07-2024). The case was decided by Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor.

What was the outcome of SKYTECH SYNERGY SDN BHD v LOW HUI PING?

SKYTECH SYNERGY SDN BHD v LOW HUI PING is a High Court decision dated January 16, 2025. The case was heard by Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Societies Act 1966

s 9(c)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-12ancvc-15-07-2024)