1. ) ABDUL HADI BIN ABDULLAH 2. ) MOHAMAD RODZI BIN SAKOOR v Kalimuthu A/l Govanasamy

ja-12b-18-06-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 October 2025 • JA-12B-18-06/2024 • 11 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

Catchwords: (L3) Rayuan — Prosedur — Kegagalan memfailkan Rekod Rayuan dalam masa — Aturan 55 Kaedah 4 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 — Sama ada syarat mandatori — Tiada permohonan lanjutan masa dibuat dalam tempoh — Sama ada Notis Rayuan patut dibatalkan — Budibicara Mahkamah — Kecuaian peguamcara — Sama ada alasan mencukupi — Prejudis kepada Responden — Keadilan prosedural — Integriti peraturan had masa — Sama ada merit rayuan boleh mengatasi ketidakpatuhan mandatori.

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (4)

Othman Hashim & Co Firm S.N Wathi Chambers Firm Nithiyawathi a/p Subramaniam Counsel Respondent Subashini Ganesan Counsel Appellant

Parties (3)

Abdul Hadi bin Abdullah Appellant Kalimuthu a/l Govanasamy Respondent Mohamad Rodzi bin Sakoor Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) ABDUL HADI BIN ABDULLAH 2. ) MOHAMAD RODZI BIN SAKOOR v Kalimuthu A/l Go... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 13, 2025 (citation: ja-12b-18-06-2024). The case was decided by Manira binti Mohd Nor.

What was the outcome of 1. ) ABDUL HADI BIN ABDULLAH 2. ) MOHAMAD RODZI BIN SAKOOR v Kalimuthu A/l Go...?

1. ) ABDUL HADI BIN ABDULLAH 2. ) MOHAMAD RODZI BIN SAKOOR v Kalimuthu A/l Go... is a High Court decision dated October 13, 2025. The case was heard by Manira binti Mohd Nor. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (6)

UK (1)
[1965] 1 WLR 8
MY (5)
[1963] MLJ 371 [1998] 2 MLJ 420 [2001] 3 CLJ 561 [2008] 6 MLJ 793 [2019] MLJU 1448

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-12b-18-06-2024)