1. ) MUHAMMAD HAFIZAM BIN NORDIN 2. ) MUHAMMAD SYAZWAN BIN MAT RABI v XXXX

ja-12b-92-11-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 7 September 2024 • JA-12B-92-11/2020 • 12 min read

4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil Procedure – Appeals – Consolidated appeals – Preliminary issue – Whether Court to determine interlocutory decision before hearing appeal proper – Jurisdiction – Effect of Court of Appeal’s ruling on non-appealable interlocutory decision – Section 3 Courts of Judicature Act 1964 – Appeals on liability and quantum – Asia Pacific Higher Learning Sdn Bhd v Majlis Perubatan Malaysia [2020] 3 CLJ 153 applied Evidence – Recalling of witnesses – Discretion of trial judge – Section 138(4) Evidence Act 1950 – Principles governing recall of witnesses –Whether new evidence constitutes unforeseen circumstances – Delay in filing application – Prejudice to opposing party – Discretion exercised correctly

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Noor Hisham bin Ismail Delivered

Counsel (4)

Naicker & Associates Firm Teo & Associates Firm JS Naicker Counsel Applicant Teo Han Ley Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Muhammad Hafizam bin Nordin Appellant Muhammad Syazwan bin Mat Rabi Appellant

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)

[1982] 1 MLJ 226 [2006] 4 CLJ 715 [2007] 2 MLJ 445 [2016] 1 CLJ 494

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-12b-92-11-2020)