1. ) Bandari Simma Realty Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) Subramaniam A/l Paidhatally v TAN BON KIAT

ja-12bncvc-30-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 March 2025 • JA-12BNCvC-30-12/2023 • 28 min read

14 cases cited (0 SG, 14 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil – Appeal against the decision of the Session Court Judge for dismissing the counter claim of the Appellant– whether the Session Court Judge erred in law by dismissing the counter claim due to the non-appearance of the Appellant’s solicitors– whether the refusal to grant an adjournment amounted to a breach of natural justice – whether appellate intervention is warranted – solicitors only filed discharge application three days before trial date

Judges (1)

Wong Mee Ling Delivered

Counsel (5)

Aida & G Ravi Firm Rabia Farihan & Sures Firm Aida Hassan Counsel Respondent G. Ravi Counsel Respondent Nurul Hibbah Abd Khalid Counsel Appellant

Parties (3)

Bandari Simma Realty Sdn Bhd Appellant Subramaniam a/l Paidhatally Appellant Tan Bon Kiat Respondent

Case Significance

Bandari Simma Realty Sdn. Bhd. v TAN BON KIAT is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 18, 2025 (citation: ja-12bncvc-30-12-2023). The case was decided by Wong Mee Ling.

What was the outcome of Bandari Simma Realty Sdn. Bhd. v TAN BON KIAT?

Bandari Simma Realty Sdn. Bhd. v TAN BON KIAT is a High Court decision dated March 18, 2025. The case was heard by Wong Mee Ling. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (14)

UK (2)

[1943] 1 All ER 627 [2020] EWHC 26

MY (12)

[1982] 1 MLJ 152 [1984] 1 MLJ 107 [1991] 1 MLJ 111 [1995] 3 MLJ 395 [1999] 2 CLJ 866 [2003] 2 CLJ 19 [2003] 2 MLJ 97 [2004] 3 CLJ 108 [2009] 4 MLJ 610 [2016] MLJU 882 [2021] 5 CLJ 193 [2022] MLJU 3484

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-12bncvc-30-12-2023)