AHMAD MAHADI BIN MOHAMAD v PUSPAKOM SDN BHD

ja-16-14-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 February 2026 • JA-16-14-11/2024 • 11 min read

13 cases cited (0 SG, 13 foreign)

Catchwords

Procedure – Appeal – Non-Compliance – Failure to serve Notices of Appeal and to file and serve Records of Appeal within prescribed time – No extension sought – Wrong mode of appeal under Order 55 instead of Order 55A ROC 2012 – Non-compliances fundamental and not curable under Order 1A or Order 2 r 1 – Appeals incompetent – Merits academic – Appeals struck out with costs.

Judges (1)

Noradura binti Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (4)

Law Practice of Azlan Shah Firm Shook Lin & Bok Firm Alison Goh Poi Sze Counsel Respondent Mohammad Muzammil bin Mohammad Hairiri Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

PUSPAKOM Sdn Bhd Respondent Ahmad Mahadi bin Mohamad Appellant

Statutes Cited

Employment Act 1955 (Cap 265)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (13)

MY (13)

[1969] 1 MLJ 153 [1996] 1 MLJ 191 [2004] 2 CLJ 316 [2005] 1 CLJ 573 [2009] 4 MLJ 149 [2017] 10 CLJ 296 [2017] MLJU 1875 [2020] 3 CLJ 353 [2021] MLJU 1642 [2021] MLJU 2713 [2023] MLJU 463 [2024] MLJU 1327 [2024] MLJU 248

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-16-14-11-2024)