1. ) JUNG CHANYOUNG 2. ) SON JAYOUNG v 1. ) KEE CYNTHIA 2. ) Er Min Cher

ja-22ip-1-01-2026 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 14 June 2026 • JA-22IP-1-01/2026 • 16 min read

5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Interlocutory Injunction — Application under Order 29 rules 1 and 2 Rules of Court 2012 — Partnership dispute involving limited liability partnership — Dispute concerning operational management, financial administration and trademark rights — Whether serious question to be tried established — Whether damages adequate remedy — Balance of convenience — Preservation of status quo — Whether interlocutory relief substantially overlaps with substantive final relief pleaded in Statement of Claim — Whether injunction would effectively determine substantive rights prior to trial — Judicial restraint in contested commercial disputes — Preliminary objections — Procedural irregularities — Order 1A and Order 2 Rules of Court 2012 — Overriding interest of justice — Specific Relief Act 1950 sections 50, 51 and 53 — American Cyanamid principles — Commercial and managerial disputes unsuitable for final determination solely on affidavit evidence.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (6)

Benjamin Poh Law Office Firm Tan Swee Im, Siva & Partners Firm Benjamin Poh Counsel Defendant Noor Anisha binti Musafri Counsel Defendant Nureen Elysya Binti Sakya Counsel Plaintiff Sivabalan a/l Sankaran Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

Er Min Cher Defendant Jung Chanyoung Plaintiff Kee Cynthia Defendant Son Jayoung Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)

Cases Cited (5)

UK (1)

[1975] 1 All ER 504

MY (4)

[1979] 1 MLJ 150 [1989] 3 MLJ 231 [1995] 1 CLJ 193 [2025] 8 CLJ 310

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-22ip-1-01-2026)