TEO PIK TAU v JB CITYTOWERS SDN BHD

ja-22ncvc-148-11-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 May 2025 • JA-22NCvC-148-11/2023 • 27 min read

18 cases cited (0 SG, 18 foreign)

Catchwords

membatalkan Writ dan Pernyataan Tuntutan Plaintif di bawah Aturan 18, Kaedah 19(1)(a), (b) dan (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 meminda Pernyataan Tuntutan di bawah Aturan 20 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 membatalkan Writ dan Pernyataan Tuntutan Plaintif di bawah A.18, k.19(1)(a),(b) dan (d) KKM kes Seruan Gemilang Makmur Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Negeri Pahang Darul Makmur & Anor [2016] 3 CLJ 1 subperenggan (b) A.18, k.19(1) KKM, “Facilitation Cost”, “Scheduled Nett Service Receipt by Agent” dan “Schedule Nett Service Fee Receipt by TPT which shall be 7% of the Scheduled Nett Service Receipt by Agent”

Judges (1)

Noor Hisham bin Ismail Delivered

Parties (2)

JB CITYTOWERS Sdn Bhd Defendant Teo Pik Tau Plaintiff

Case Significance

TEO PIK TAU v JB CITYTOWERS SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 27, 2025 (citation: ja-22ncvc-148-11-2023). The case was decided by Noor Hisham bin Ismail.

What was the outcome of TEO PIK TAU v JB CITYTOWERS SDN BHD?

TEO PIK TAU v JB CITYTOWERS SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated May 27, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hisham bin Ismail. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (18)

UK (5)

[1899] 1 QB 86 [1936] 1 KB 712 [1965] 1 QB 222 [1965] 1 WLR 1238 [1965] 2 All ER 871

MY (13)

[1985] 1 MLJ 226 [1993] 4 CLJ 1 [1997] 2 MLJ 565 [2002] 1 CLJ 405 [2003] 1 CLJ 767 [2006] 7 CLJ 541 [2007] 7 MLJ 153 [2012] 1 CLJ 75 [2012] 1 MLJ 473 [2013] 3 MLJ 235 [2016] 3 CLJ 1 [2017] 4 MLJ 540 [2019] 6 CLJ 41

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-22ncvc-148-11-2023)