DING MING MING v 1. ) LIM SU JIN 2. ) LIM SU LING

ja-23ncvc-4-04-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 October 2025 • JA-23NCvC-4-04/2021 • 28 min read

23 cases cited (0 SG, 23 foreign)

Catchwords

1. The Plaintiff proved that the Defendants published defamatory Facebook and WhatsApp statements in February 2020 implying she was unqualified, negligent and caused injury during acupuncture. 2. The statements were defamatory, referred to the Plaintiff and were published to third parties. 3. The Defendants failed to establish justification, fair comment or qualified privilege. 4. Judgment is entered for the Plaintiff. 5. Damages and injunction to be assessed upon submissions on quantum. 6. Counterclaim is dismissed with costs.

Judges (1)

Noradura binti Hamzah Delivered

Parties (3)

Ding Ming Ming Plaintiff Lim Su Jin Defendant Lim Su Ling Defendant

Case Significance

DING MING MING v 1. ) LIM SU JIN 2. ) LIM SU LING is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 13, 2025 (citation: ja-23ncvc-4-04-2021). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.

What was the outcome of DING MING MING v 1. ) LIM SU JIN 2. ) LIM SU LING?

DING MING MING v 1. ) LIM SU JIN 2. ) LIM SU LING is a High Court decision dated October 13, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

s 17

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (23)

UK (3)

[1894] 2 QB 54 [1971] 1 WLR 1239 [1975] AC 135

MY (20)

[1972] 1 MLJ 45 [1973] 2 MLJ 56 [1988] 1 CLJ 771 [1988] 1 MLRH 653 [1989] 1 CLJ 152 [1989] 1 MLJ 315 [1993] 2 MLJ 408 [1999] 1 CLJ 461 [2002] 2 MLRH 389 [2002] 3 AMR 3554 [2002] 7 CLJ 32 [2002] 7 MLJ 283 [2006] 2 CLJ 46 [2014] 4 MLJ 478 [2019] 3 CLJ 729 [2021] 5 MLJ 79 [2021] 7 CLJ 145 [2021] 7 CLJ 353 [2021] MLJU 1232 [2023] MLJU 3145

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-23ncvc-4-04-2021)