M&C PRECISION SDN BHD v PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN SDN BHD PENCELAH MCLEAN PLASTIC ENGINEERING SDN. BHD.

ja-24ncvc-1343-09-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 January 2026 • JA-24NCvC-1343-09/2025 • 11 min read
4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Prosiding sivil — Injunksi interim / ad interim — Permohonan di bawah Aturan 29 Kaedah 1(2) dan Aturan 92 Kaedah 4 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 — Prinsip injunksi interim — Serious question to be tried — Kewujudan isu substantif berhubung status penyewaan — Pertikaian fakta material — Tidak sesuai diputuskan melalui afidavit semata-mata — Tay Bok Choon v Tahansan Sdn Bhd [1987] 1 MLJ 433 (PC) Injunksi interim — Irreparable harm — Sama ada ganti rugi merupakan remedi mencukupi — Plaintif menuntut dan menganggarkan kerugian kewangan — Kerugian boleh dinilai secara monetari — Injunksi tidak wajar diberikan — Keet Gerald Francis Noel v Mohd Noor @ Harun [1995] 1 MLJ 193 (FC) — Thean Seng Smart Trading Sdn Bhd v Wellesley Assets I Sdn Bhd [2025] MLJU 6291 — Plaza Premium Lounge Malaysia Sdn Bhd v Malaysia Airports (Sepang) Sdn Bhd [2025] MLJU 7622 Injunksi interim — Balance of convenience — Tujuan injunksi untuk mengekalkan status quo — Injunksi tidak boleh mengubah kedudukan undang-undang pihak — Risiko pra-penentuan isu utama — Hak pemilik berdaftar — Yamaha Motor Co Ltd v Yamaha Malaysia Sdn Bhd [1983] 1 MLJ 213 (FC) Ekuiti — Prinsip clean hands — Relif injunksi sebagai relif budi bicara — Kelakuan pemohon — Ketidakpatuhan terma kontrak dipertikaikan — Mahkamah tidak berpuas hati untuk melaksanakan budi bicara ekuiti — Lau Peng Hon v L&N Sdn Bhd [2008] 6 MLJ 49 (CA) Keputusan — Permohonan injunksi interim dan ad interim — Ditolak — Pertimbangan kumulatif semua prasyarat injunksi — Kos dalam kausa

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (5)

Benjamin Poh Law Office Firm L.X Chiah and Associates Firm Benjamin Poh Counsel Plaintiff Chiah Li Xin Counsel Intervener Fatin Farhana Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

M&C PRECISION Sdn Bhd Applicant MCLEAN PLASTIC ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Intervener PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

M&C PRECISION SDN BHD v PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN SDN BHD PENCELAH MCLEAN PLAS... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 18, 2026 (citation: ja-24ncvc-1343-09-2025). <p>M&C Precision, an existing tenant of factory premises, filed suit regarding tenancy renewal rights. McLean Plastic Engineering applied to intervene as a party, claiming it had entered into a new tenancy agreement for the same premises. The court dismissed the intervention application, finding the proposed intervener had no real and direct legal interest, entered the new lease with knowledge of the existing dispute, and its presence was unnecessary for effective disposal of the case between ex The case was decided by Manira binti Mohd Nor. Counsel appearing: Benjamin Poh (counsel for plaintiff), Chiah Li Xin (counsel for intervener), Fatin Farhana (counsel for plaintiff).

Summary

M&C Precision, an existing tenant of factory premises, filed suit regarding tenancy renewal rights. McLean Plastic Engineering applied to intervene as a party, claiming it had entered into a new tenancy agreement for the same premises. The court dismissed the intervention application, finding the proposed intervener had no real and direct legal interest, entered the new lease with knowledge of the existing dispute, and its presence was unnecessary for effective disposal of the case between existing parties.

What was the outcome of M&C PRECISION SDN BHD v PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN SDN BHD PENCELAH MCLEAN PLAS...?

<p>M&C Precision, an existing tenant of factory premises, filed suit regarding tenancy renewal rights. McLean Plastic Engineering applied to intervene...

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)
[1969] 2 MLJ 52 [2001] 7 CLJ 633 [2009] 4 CLJ 57 [2010] 7 CLJ 917

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-24ncvc-1343-09-2025)