1. ) SURESH A/L DORASAMY 2. ) KAYTRE A/P DORASAMY v 1. ) PARTIBAN A/L DORASAMY 2. ) KAYTRI SERVICES SDN. BHD. 3. ) KAYTRI SERVICES

ja-24ncvc-135-01-2026 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 May 2026 • JA-24NCvC-135-01/2026 • 14 min read
14 cases cited (0 SG, 14 foreign)

Catchwords

Company Law – Mareva Injunction – Asset preservation – Alleged breach of directors’ duties – Minority shareholder complaint – Sole director managing company and partnership assets. Companies Act 2016, ss 213, 346(1) – Alleged oppression, mismanagement and unauthorised dealings with company assets. Partnership Act 1961, ss 22–36 – Duties between partners – Continued unilateral management of partnership affairs. Injunction – Three-limb test satisfied – Good arguable case – Assets within jurisdiction – Real risk of dissipation established. Evidence – Hearsay allegations considered – Court placed reliance primarily on documentary evidence. Order – Mareva injunction granted – Asset disclosure ordered – Independent audit directed – Production of financial records ordered – Costs awarded.

Practice Areas

Company Law Evidence

Judges (1)

Noradura binti Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (4)

Chelva R. Suppiah & Co. Firm Shobana M & Associates Firm Chelvarajan a/l R Suppiah Counsel Respondent Monisha a/p John Selvam Counsel Applicant

Parties (5)

KAYTRI SERVICES Sdn Bhd Respondent Kaytre a/p Dorasamy Applicant Kaytri Services Respondent Partiban a/l Dorasamy Respondent Suresh a/l Dorasamy Applicant

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
Rules of Court 2012
Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)
s 53

Cases Cited (14)

MY (14)
[1988] 1 MLJ 97 [1989] 2 MLJ 153 [1989] 3 MLJ 456 [1998] 1 MLJ 89 [1998] 4 CLJ 754 [1999] 4 MLJ 217 [2006] 7 MLJ 171 [2014] 8 MLJ 271 [2019] 10 MLJ 596 [2021] MLJU 122 [2022] MLJU 3411 [2024] 12 MLJ 1 [2025] MLJU 1184 [2025] MLJU 188

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-24ncvc-135-01-2026)