PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN
ja-24ncvc-306-03-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 October 2025 • JA-24NCvC-306-03/2025 • 10 min read
7 cases cited
(0 SG, 7 foreign)
Catchwords
1. Application under O.42 r.13 / O.92 r.4 to set aside ex parte order (14.05.2025). 2. Ex parte leave to enforce Sessions Court judgment via Prohibitory Order (O.47 r.6; ss.5, 324, 334 NLC). 3. Judgment not properly served; service on former solicitors invalid. 4. No personal/AR service; affidavit of service unreliable. 5. Prohibitory Order registered prematurely before service; no notice to chargee (AmBank). 6. Time under O.42 r.13 not triggered; application filed within time. 7. Sufficient cause shown under O.47 r.6(k). 8. Ex parte order and Prohibitory Order set aside; costs RM8,000.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 29, 2025 (citation: ja-24ncvc-306-03-2025). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 1. Application under O.42 r.13 / O.92 r.4 to set aside ex parte order (14.05.2025)..
What was the outcome of PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN?
PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN is a High Court decision dated October 29, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
National Land Code (Cap 828)
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (7)
MY (7)
[1996] 1 MLJ 223 [2002] 3 CLJ 108 [2008] 2 MLJ 348 [2008] 7 MLJ 297 [2014] 1 MLJ 422 [2015] 7 MLJ 325 [2025] MLJU 116
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ja-24ncvc-306-03-2025)