DANGA BAY SDN BHD v 1. ) RENGANATHAN A/L KARUPAYA 2. ) YOGAMBIGA A/P SINNIAH 3. ) PARAMESWARI A/P SUBRAMANIAM
ja-24ncvc-635-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 17 September 2025 • JA-24NCvC-635-05/2025 • 14 min read
14 cases cited
(0 SG, 14 foreign)
Catchwords
1. The Plaintiff seeks vacant possession under Order 89 of the Rules of Court 2012 against the Defendants who occupy the land without consent. 2. The Defendants contend lawful occupation due to a temple’s long existence, oral agreement, and freedom of religion. 3. The Court finds the Plaintiff as the registered proprietor under Section 340 NLC; the Order dated 26 February 2014 terminated any prior licence. 4. No bona fide triable issue arises; res judicata does not apply. 5. The Defendants are trespassers ab initio. The Plaintiff’s application under Order 89 ROC 2012 is allowed with costs.
Judges (1)
Counsel (1)
Case Significance
DANGA BAY SDN BHD v 1. ) RENGANATHAN A/L KARUPAYA 2. ) YOGAMBIGA A/P SINNIAH ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 17, 2025 (citation: ja-24ncvc-635-05-2025). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 1. The Plaintiff seeks vacant possession under Order 89 of the Rules of Court 2012 against the Defendants who occupy the land without consent..
What was the outcome of DANGA BAY SDN BHD v 1. ) RENGANATHAN A/L KARUPAYA 2. ) YOGAMBIGA A/P SINNIAH ...?
DANGA BAY SDN BHD v 1. ) RENGANATHAN A/L KARUPAYA 2. ) YOGAMBIGA A/P SINNIAH ... is a High Court decision dated September 17, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.
Cases Cited (14)
MY (14)
[1982] 1 MLJ 313 [1992] MLJU 29 [1994] 1 CLJ 313 [1994] 3 CLJ 64 [1996] 1 CLJ 173 [1996] 2 CLJ 965 [1998] 4 MLJ 233 [1999] 1 CLJ 575 [2000] 4 CLJ 375 [2004] 2 MLJ 306 [2007] 4 CLJ 253 [2014] 5 CLJ 817 [2019] 7 CLJ 788 [2021] 6 CLJ 650
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ja-24ncvc-635-05-2025)