DATO' SHAHRIL BIN ISMAIL v 1. ) PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB 2. ) KETUA SETIAUSAHA NEGARA 3. ) KETUA PENGARAH PERKHIDMATAN AWAM 4. ) PENGARAH BAHAGIAN PENCEN 5. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

ja-25-32-10-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 November 2025 • JA-25-32-10/2023 • 27 min read
9 cases cited (0 SG, 9 foreign)

Catchwords

PENZAHIRAN DOKUMEN – Aturan 24 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 – relevansi – necessity – Semakan Kehakiman – rekod keputusan – Peraturan 49(3) Peraturan-Peraturan Pegawai Awam (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) 1993 – dokumen terperingkat – Akta Rahsia Rasmi 1972 – privilege – public interest immunity – kuasa Mahkamah di bawah seksyen 25(2) Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 – fishing expedition – skop JR – rekod keputusan pentadbiran – permohonan ditolak.

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (5)

Misyail Othman & Co Firm Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Johor Firm Azamuddin Counsel Applicant Najib Counsel Applicant Suhana Binti Sabil Counsel Respondent

Parties (6)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent Ketua Pengarah Perkhidmatan Awam Respondent PENGARAH BAHAGIAN PENCEN Respondent PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB Respondent Dato' Shahril bin Ismail Applicant Ketua Setiausaha Negara Respondent

Case Significance

DATO' SHAHRIL BIN ISMAIL v 1. ) PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB 2. ) KETUA SETIAUSA... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 5, 2025 (citation: ja-25-32-10-2023). The case was decided by Manira binti Mohd Nor.

What was the outcome of DATO' SHAHRIL BIN ISMAIL v 1. ) PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB 2. ) KETUA SETIAUSA...?

DATO' SHAHRIL BIN ISMAIL v 1. ) PIHAK BERKUASA TATATERTIB 2. ) KETUA SETIAUSA... is a High Court decision dated November 5, 2025. The case was heard by Manira binti Mohd Nor. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (9)

UK (2)
[1982] 3 All ER 141 [1985] AC 374
MY (7)
[1981] 2 MLJ 259 [1997] 1 CLJ 147 [2007] 1 CLJ 300 [2010] 8 CLJ 629 [2012] 6 MLJ 774 [2018] 2 CLJ 513 [2021] 10 CLJ 737

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-25-32-10-2023)