Pendakwa Raya [Pendakwa Raya] v 1. ) ZAINUDIN BIN ABD WAHAB 2. ) MUHAMMAD AZIMUDDIN ANWAR BIN AMIR HAMZAH

ja-43a-3-10-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 January 2025 • JA-43(A)-3-10/2024 • 20 min read

8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Catchwords

Permohonan semakan - Permohonan dibenarkan - Perintah Majistret diakaskan - Mahkamah berpendapat bahawa perintah yang dikeluarkan oleh Puan Majisret pada 28.10.2024 terhadap OYDS-OYDS bersama-sama syarat tambahan adalah satu ketidakteraturan dalam prosedur reman yang wajib diketepikan sebelum ia menjadi norma baru dalam permohonan reman Undang-undang - Kanun Tatacara Jenayah - Seksyen 323 - seksyen 360 - Seksyen 117 Permohonan reman - seksyen 118 Permohonan bon - seksyen 388 permohonan jaminan oleh Polis Undang-undang - Permohonan pelepasan daripada reman setelah tamat tempoh reman - Keperluan untuk OYDS dikemukakan semula dihadapan Majistret yang mendengar reman bagi perintah pelepasan daripada reman - Kanun Prosedur Jenayah

Judges (1)

Suriyati Hasimah binti Mohd Hashim Delivered

Counsel (2)

Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia Firm Muhammad Asraf Bin Mohamed Tahir Counsel Applicant

Parties (3)

Pendakwa Raya Applicant Muhammad Azimuddin Anwar bin Amir Hamzah Respondent Zainudin bin Abd Wahab Respondent

Case Significance

Pendakwa Raya [Pendakwa Raya] v 1. ) ZAINUDIN BIN ABD WAHAB 2. ) MUHAMMAD AZI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 22, 2025 (citation: ja-43a-3-10-2024). The case was decided by Suriyati Hasimah binti Mohd Hashim.

Key issues: Undang-undang - Kanun Tatacara Jenayah - Seksyen 323 - seksyen 360 - Seksyen 117 Permohonan reman - seksyen 118 Permohonan bon - seksyen 388 permohonan jaminan oleh Polis.

What was the outcome of Pendakwa Raya [Pendakwa Raya] v 1. ) ZAINUDIN BIN ABD WAHAB 2. ) MUHAMMAD AZI...?

Pendakwa Raya [Pendakwa Raya] v 1. ) ZAINUDIN BIN ABD WAHAB 2. ) MUHAMMAD AZI... is a High Court decision dated January 22, 2025. The case was heard by Suriyati Hasimah binti Mohd Hashim. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Federal Constitution

Penal Code (Cap 574)

Cases Cited (8)

MY (8)

[2009] 4 CLJ 90 [2010] 9 CLJ 1006 [2011] 2 CLJ 441 [2011] 6 MLJ 220 [2014] 6 MLJ 812 [2015] 7 CLJ 897 [2018] 4 MLJ 139 [2024] MLJU 2990

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-43a-3-10-2024)