MUHAMMAD AMIRUL BIN UMAR v 1. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KONTINJEN JOHOR 2. ) KERAJAAN MALAYSIA

jb-25-4-03-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 30 September 2025 • JB-25-4-03/2024 • 15 min read

Catchwords

Administrative Law - Judicial review - Dismissal of police officer - Whether the charge is duplicity and incomplete - Documents relevant for the charges to be given Administrative Law - Right to be heard - Oral representation Administrative Law - Compliance with regulation 35 and 37 of the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 Administrative Law - Failure to provide grounds of decision - Whether breach of natural justice Administrative Law - Doctrine of proportionality - Whether dismissal was harsh and unreasonable

Practice Areas

Administrative Law

Judges (1)

Kalyana Kumar Sockalingam Delivered

Counsel (4)

Manian Nair & Co. Firm Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Melaka Firm Ebrina bin Zubir Counsel Applicant Izzatul Nawwarah binti Idrus Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KONTINJEN JOHOR Respondent Muhammad Amirul bin Umar Applicant

Case Significance

MUHAMMAD AMIRUL BIN UMAR v 1. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KONTINJEN JOHOR 2. ) KERAJ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 30, 2025 (citation: jb-25-4-03-2024). The case was decided by Kalyana Kumar Sockalingam.

What was the outcome of MUHAMMAD AMIRUL BIN UMAR v 1. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KONTINJEN JOHOR 2. ) KERAJ...?

MUHAMMAD AMIRUL BIN UMAR v 1. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB KONTINJEN JOHOR 2. ) KERAJ... is a High Court decision dated September 30, 2025. The case was heard by Kalyana Kumar Sockalingam. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (jb-25-4-03-2024)