ANIS ARIANTI BINTI ARIFFIN v NUR KHALIDA BINTI KHALID

ka-12b-9-04-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 3 March 2026 • KA-12B-9-04/2025 • 35 min read

32 cases cited (0 SG, 32 foreign)

Catchwords

Action for defamation - The matter was heard before the learned Sessions Judge, who allowed the Plaintiff’s claim. - The Defendant lodged an appeal - The Plaintiff filed a cross appeal - discontented with the award of damages, considered the sum inadequate and filed a cross appeal. - Finding no appealable error in the decision of the learned Sessions Judge - No grounds for appellate intervention - Locus standi - Pleadings - Defamatory nature of the impugned statements - Defences of justification and fair comment - Damages

Judges (1)

Mohd Aimi Zaini bin Mohd Azhar Delivered

Counsel (5)

Hifdzi Salmiah Kee Hanisah & Co Firm Ibrahim & Fuaadah Firm Nor Aziah bt. Harun Counsel Appellant Nurfarah Athirah bt. Muhammad Faizal Counsel Appellant Nurul Zaemah bt. Abd Rahman Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Anis Arianti binti Ariffin Appellant Nur Khalida binti Khalid Respondent

Statutes Cited

Consumer Protection Act 1999 (Cap 599)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (32)

UK (3)

[1935] 1 KB 354 [1963] 2 All ER 151 [1963] 3 All ER 952

MY (29)

[1973] 2 MLJ 56 [1988] 2 MLJ 173 [1989] 1 CLJ 152 [1989] 3 MLJ 1 [1993] 2 CLJ 365 [1995] 1 MLJ 39 [1996] 1 MLJ 393 [1997] 5 MLJ 523 [1999] 1 CLJ 461 [2002] 7 MLJ 283 [2003] 1 CLJ 585 [2003] 2 CLJ 19 [2003] 6 MLJ 433 [2005] 2 MLJ 397 [2005] 3 MLJ 494 [2008] 7 MLJ 569 [2010] 2 MLJ 188 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2011] 6 CLJ 62 [2013] 8 MLJ 348 [2014] 10 CLJ 320 [2016] 1 CLJ 30 [2016] 5 MLJ 113 [2016] 6 AMR 145 [2017] 2 CLJ 453 [2017] 4 CLJ 369 [2017] 6 CLJ 129 [2019] 3 MLJ 720 [2020] MLJU 257

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ka-12b-9-04-2025)