AZURA BINTI IBRAHIM v YUAN TRADING & AGENCY SDN BHD

ka-22ncvc-42-07-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 August 2025 • KA-22NCvC-42-07/2020 • 30 min read

10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

Contract Law - Sale Agreement - Specific performance - Power of Attorney - Validity - Malay Reserve Land - Contracts Act 1950 s 24 - Moneylending - Illegal moneylending - Civil Procedure - Pleadings - Evidence - Judicial Comity - Equity - Remedies - Whether the Power of Attorney conflicts with Section 10 of the Kedah Malay Reserve Enactment - Whether the third-party purchaser is entitled to the remedy of specific performance of the Consensual Agreement.

Judges (1)

John Lee Kien How @ Mohammad Johan Lee Delivered

Counsel (6)

C. P. Ang & Co Firm Chambers of Zabidah Ahmad Firm Syarikat Ng & Anuar Firm Ang Khoon Cheong Counsel Plaintiff Chang Chen Choong Counsel Defendant Zabidah Binti Ahmad Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

YUAN TRADING & AGENCY Sdn Bhd Defendant Azura binti Ibrahim Plaintiff

Case Significance

AZURA BINTI IBRAHIM v YUAN TRADING & AGENCY SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 13, 2025 (citation: ka-22ncvc-42-07-2020). The case was decided by John Lee Kien How @ Mohammad Johan Lee.

What was the outcome of AZURA BINTI IBRAHIM v YUAN TRADING & AGENCY SDN BHD?

AZURA BINTI IBRAHIM v YUAN TRADING & AGENCY SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated August 13, 2025. The case was heard by John Lee Kien How @ Mohammad Johan Lee. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)

Moneylenders Act

s 100A

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (10)

MY (10)

[1993] 2 CLJ 640 [1996] 1 MLJ 45 [2012] MLJU 474 [2014] MLJU 629 [2018] 8 MLJ 373 [2021] 7 MLJ 766 [2022] 5 MLJ 74 [2023] 10 CLJ 187 [2023] 3 MLJ 451 [2024] 1 MLJ 755

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ka-22ncvc-42-07-2020)