TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v B.S. CIVIL ENGINEERING SDN. BHD.

ka-28ncc-14-02-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 March 2025 • KA-28NCC-14-02/2024 • 9 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

Petisyen Penggulungan di bawah perenggan 466(1)(a) Akta Syarikat 2016 dan Kaedah-Kaedah (Penggulungan) Syarikat 1972 - Notis Tuntutan di bawah perenggan 466(1)(a) - isu-isu utama yang perlu diputuskan - Sama ada hutang yang menjadi asas Petisyen ini merupakan hutang yang sah, pasti dan boleh dituntut (debt due and payable) di bawah perenggan 466(1)(a) Akta Syarikat 2016 - Sama ada wujud sebarang pertikaian bona fide terhadap hutang tersebut yang menjadikan prosiding penggulungan tidak sesuai digunakan - Sama ada Petisyen ini merupakan penyalahgunaan proses Mahkamah - penafian umum tanpa sebarang bukti kukuh yang menunjukkan bahawa hutang tersebut tidak wujud atau telah dibayar - tidak mencapai ambang pertikaian bona fide sebagaimana ditetapkan oleh undang-undang – Prinsip Undang-undang - It is trite law that the court will not allow a petition for winding up to proceed where there exists a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds. However, it is equally trite that a mere assertion or denial, unsupported by credible evidence, does not constitute a bona fide dispute.

Judges (1)

Mahazan binti Mat Taib Delivered

Counsel (7)

Lim Huck Aik & Co Firm Max Yee & Ang Firm Melissa Lim & Associates Firm Ang Jun Jia Counsel Respondent Melissa Lim Counsel Respondent Muhammad Khairul Izzan Sajali Counsel Petitioner Ong We En Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

B.S. CIVIL ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Respondent TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD Petitioner

Case Significance

TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v B.S. CIVIL ENGINEERING SDN. BHD. is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 18, 2025 (citation: ka-28ncc-14-02-2024). The case was decided by Mahazan binti Mat Taib.

What was the outcome of TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v B.S. CIVIL ENGINEERING SDN. BHD.?

TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v B.S. CIVIL ENGINEERING SDN. BHD. is a High Court decision dated March 18, 2025. The case was heard by Mahazan binti Mat Taib. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (6)

UK (1)
[1988] 1 WLR 1068
MY (5)
[1993] 3 MLJ 36 [1996] 3 MLJ 498 [1999] 3 MLJ 305 [2006] 1 CLJ 429 [2007] 6 CLJ 532

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ka-28ncc-14-02-2024)