PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) XXXX 2. ) ASMA 'AQILA BINTI NAZARI 3. ) MOHD NUR HAZWAN BIN OTHMAN 4. ) QHAIRUN NIESA BINTI MAHAMAD 5. ) SITI AZURA BINTI TOPANI 6. ) ZULKHAIRI BIN JAMA'AL AZAHAR

ka-45-3-02-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 15 June 2025 • KA-45-3-02/2022 • 24 min read
7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

Pertuduhan bagi kesalahan memiliki dan mengedar dadah berbahaya terhadap 6 orang OKT yang ditahan di dalam sebuah rumah. Kesemua OKT sedang tidur semasa serbuan dijalankan dan dadah ditemui di ruangan tengah rumah. Penyewa asal rumah telah menyewa semula (sublet) kepada penama Zamani yang dikatakan telah menyewakan semula kepada OKT1 - OKT6. Tiada kunci rumah dirampas walaupun keterangan Pengadu mengatakan pintu hadapan rumah dibuka oleh OKT1 menggunakan kunci. Pendakwaan gagal membuktikan kes pendakwaan pada tahap prima facie dan OKT1 - OKT dilepas dan dibebaskan tanpa dipanggil membela diri.

Judges (1)

Evawani Farisyta binti Mohammad Delivered

Counsel (7)

Burhan & Company Firm Haffiz Zuhair Adawiah & Co. Firm Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Kedah Firm Burhanudeen bin Abdul Wahid Counsel Accused Grace D' Raj Counsel Accused Mohd Rizal bin Fadzil Counsel Prosecution Syed Muhammad Anwar Bin Syed Lokman Hakim Counsel Accused

Parties (7)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Asma 'aqila binti Nazari Accused Mohd Nur Hazwan bin Othman Accused Qhairun Niesa binti Mahamad Accused Siti Azura binti Topani Accused Xxxx Accused Zulkhairi bin Jama'al Azahar Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) XXXX 2. ) ASMA 'AQILA BINTI NAZARI ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 15, 2025 (citation: ka-45-3-02-2022). The case was decided by Evawani Farisyta binti Mohammad.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) XXXX 2. ) ASMA 'AQILA BINTI NAZARI ...?

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH 1. ) XXXX 2. ) ASMA 'AQILA BINTI NAZARI ... is a High Court decision dated June 15, 2025. The case was heard by Evawani Farisyta binti Mohammad. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)
[1956] MLJ 237 [1956] MLJ 28 [1993] 3 MLJ 1 [2005] 1 CLJ 85 [2005] 6 MLJ 393 [2009] 2 MLJ 194 [2019] 6 MLJ 231

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ka-45-3-02-2022)