RAHMAT JUTAMAS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) HOI HUAT INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD. 2. ) Wong Fee Chew 3. ) Lim Tio Huat

kb-22ncvc-6-03-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 March 2026 • KB-22NCvC-6-03/2022 • 14 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Application for consequential order - Order 92 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 – tenancy of two premises rented by the First Defendant to the Plaintiff - Consent Judgment was recorded on 17.10.2023 - Whether the Court is functions officio - Whether the Plaintiff's obligation to provide "reasonable cooperation" extends to undertaking structural reinstatement works - Whether First Defendant is entitled to the release of ex-gratia payment - Whether the Plaintiff has been unjustly enriched by continuing to occupy the premises without paying rent.

Judges (1)

Darmafikri bin Abu Adam Delivered

Counsel (6)

Chooi, Saw & Lim Firm Lee Law Office Firm Benjamin Tan Yee Bin Counsel Defendant Ng Sze Wei Counsel Defendant Saw Lip Khai Counsel Plaintiff Vivianne Khoo Wei Vern Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

HOI HUAT INDUSTRIES Sdn Bhd Defendant RAHMAT JUTAMAS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Lim Tio Huat Defendant Wong Fee Chew Defendant

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[2013] 9 MLJ 69 [2020] 9 CLJ 358 [2021] MLJU 2379

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (kb-22ncvc-6-03-2022)