1. ) WONG SIN YIN 2. ) SAM PIK YING v MDSA RESOURCES SDN. BHD. (Dahulu dikenali sebagai Fuyuu Resources Sdn. Bhd.)
Catchwords
Contract — Sale and purchase agreement — Commercial property — Delivery of vacant possession — Certificate of completion and compliance (CCC) — Partial CCC (Form F1) — Condition precedent — Deeming provision — Liquidated ascertained damages (LAD) — Late delivery — Whether notice of vacant possession valid — Whether CCC satisfying contractual requirements — Evidence — Burden of proof — ss 101–103 Evidence Act 1950 — Adverse inference — s 114(g) Evidence Act 1950 — Unrebutted evidence — Defendant electing not to call evidence — No case to answer — Effect of cross-examination without calling evidence — Architect’s report — Weight of expert evidence — Whether defences proved — Practice and procedure — Consolidated actions — Representative proceedings — Assessment of damages — Reference to Registrar — Costs — Malaysia.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ma-22c-1-02-2021)