SUNG TIAK KENG v 1. ) Pendakwa Raya [Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM)] 2. ) PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA 3. ) SIANG TIAK HOCK 4. ) KOH KIM HO

ma-25-9-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 March 2026 • MA-25-9-10/2025

Catchwords

Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Leave application — Challenge to prosecutorial decision — Whether applicant crossed threshold for leave — Order 53 Rules of Court 2012 Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Locus standi — Requirement that applicant be “adversely affected” — Complainant in criminal proceedings seeking to challenge discontinuance of prosecution — Whether complainant possessed sufficient standing — Order 53 r 2(4) Rules of Court 2012 Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Limitation period — Application to be filed within three months of decision — Failure to file within prescribed period — Absence of application for extension of time — Whether leave application incompetent — Order 53 r 3(6) Rules of Court 2012 Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Proper respondent — Requirement that judicial review be directed against actual decision-maker — Failure to cite prosecutorial decision-maker responsible for impugned decision — Whether application fatally defective Constitutional Law — Public Prosecutor — Prosecutorial discretion — Power to institute, conduct or discontinue criminal proceedings — Federal Constitution art 145(3) Constitutional Law — Prosecutorial discretion — Judicial review — Scope of review — Presumption of legality — Requirement of compelling prima facie evidence — Sundra Rajoo a/l Nadarajah v Menteri Luar Negeri, Malaysia & Ors [2021] 5 MLJ 209 Administrative Law — Judicial review of prosecutorial discretion — Distinction between challenge to legality and disagreement with exercise of discretion — Court not entitled to substitute its view for that of prosecutorial authority Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Leave stage — Court confined to threshold inquiry — Whether applicant established compelling prima facie evidence of illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety or mala fides

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Parties (5)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ma-25-9-10-2025)