Pendakwa Raya [Pendakwa Raya] v 1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAHMIZAL BIN AZIZAN 2. ) HASLAILI BINTI ABDUL AZIZ 3. ) MOHD ALIFF BIN IDRIS 4. ) SAYAD BOSHOR BIN MOHD HASHIM 5. ) NURUL BASHAR BIN MOHD HASHIM 6. ) ZULKIFLI BIN SAID

p-05lb-232-05-2022 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 25 September 2024 • P-05(LB)-232-05/2022 • 24 min read
44 cases cited (0 SG, 44 foreign)

Catchwords

A criminal charge must disclose the essential ingredients of the offence, but failure to specify every distinct act under s. 3(1) of the Kidnapping Act 1961 does not render the charge a nullity if the offence of kidnapping for ransom is sufficiently pleaded. Such particulars are not mandatory ingredients but details, and their omission does not mislead the accused. Accordingly, the High Court erred in holding the charge defective, and appellate intervention was warranted to remit the case for determination on the evidence.

Judges (3)

Ahmad Zaidi bin Ibrahim Coram Lim Chong Fong Delivered Noorin binti Badaruddin Coram

Counsel (7)

Attorney General Chambers Firm Ridha & Co. Firm Tan Chee Keong & Co. Firm Dhiya Syazwani Izyan binti Mohd Akhir Counsel Prosecution Joseph Tan Counsel Respondent Lau Yih Ling Counsel Respondent Ridha Abdah Subri Counsel Respondent

Parties (7)

Pendakwa Raya Appellant Haslaili binti Abdul Aziz Respondent Mohd Aliff bin Idris Respondent Muhammad Shahmizal bin Azizan Respondent Nurul Bashar bin Mohd Hashim Respondent Sayad Boshor bin Mohd Hashim Respondent Zulkifli bin Said Respondent

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)
Indian Criminal Procedure Code
s 215
Indian Penal Code (Cap 574)
s 124A
Penal Code (Cap 574)
Sedition Act
s 3(1) s 4(1)(c)
Sedition Act 1948
s 3(1)

Cases Cited (44)

MY (44)
[1936] MLJ 137 [1961] 1 MLRH 683 [1962] 1 MLJ 107 [1975] 2 MLJ 235 [1992] 1 AMR 47 [1992] 2 MLJ 714 [1993] 3 MLJ 20 [1997] 3 MLJ 517 [1997] 4 CLJ 405 [2000] 3 MLRH 42 [2000] 4 AMR 4913 [2000] 4 MLJ 791 [2000] 7 CLJ 600 [2001] 1 MLRH 168 [2001] 2 CLJ 498 [2001] 3 MLJ 172 [2002] 2 MLRH 128 [2002] 4 MLJ 84 [2002] 6 CLJ 405 [2003] 1 MLRH 261 [2003] 2 CLJ 549 [2003] 3 AMR 592 [2003] 5 MLJ 433 [2004] 6 AMR 496 [2005] 1 CLJ 398 [2005] 4 MLJ 314 [2006] 1 CLJ 457 [2006] 2 MLRH 503 [2006] 4 MLJ 334 [2006] 6 CLJ 392 [2008] 4 MLRH 748 [2010] 5 CLJ 489 [2011] 1 CLJ 360 [2011] 7 MLJ 575 [2013] 2 CLJ 1025 [2015] 3 CLJ 421 [2015] 5 AMR 284 [2015] 6 CLJ 438 [2015] 6 MLJ 509 [2015] 6 MLJ 824 [2016] 1 CLJ 529 [2016] 8 CLJ 15 [2017] 7 CLJ 214 [2022] 6 MLRH 660

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (p-05lb-232-05-2022)