1. ) THURAISINGAM A/L PITCHAY MARIE 2. ) PUSPOM A/P PITCHAY MARIE v CHEAH EWE HUAT

pa-11bncvc-5-07-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 December 2025 • PA-11BNCvC-5-07/2025 • 18 min read

21 cases cited (0 SG, 21 foreign)

Catchwords

1. This is an appeal against the decision of the Magistrate, whereby the Magistrate allowed the Respondent’s claim of vacant possession of the Land be delivered to the Respondent. 2. The appeal is dismissed, and the decision of the Magistrate is affirmed and ordered accordingly.

Judges (1)

Suzana binti Muhamad Said Delivered

Counsel (5)

A G Roseli & Paul Firm T Tharuma & Assoc Firm Tan Jia Jun Counsel Appellant Tharumarajah Counsel Appellant Vimalan Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Cheah Ewe Huat Respondent Puspom a/p Pitchay Marie Appellant Thuraisingam a/l Pitchay Marie Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) THURAISINGAM A/L PITCHAY MARIE 2. ) PUSPOM A/P PITCHAY MARIE v CHEAH EWE... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated December 18, 2025 (citation: pa-11bncvc-5-07-2025). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.

What was the outcome of 1. ) THURAISINGAM A/L PITCHAY MARIE 2. ) PUSPOM A/P PITCHAY MARIE v CHEAH EWE...?

1. ) THURAISINGAM A/L PITCHAY MARIE 2. ) PUSPOM A/P PITCHAY MARIE v CHEAH EWE... is a High Court decision dated December 18, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Limitation Act 1953 (Cap 254)

Cases Cited (21)

MY (21)

[1995] 3 CLJ 783 [1995] 3 MLJ 189 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2004] 6 AMR 781 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2010] 5 MLJ 228 [2010] 7 CLJ 491 [2011] 4 MLJ 769 [2013] 5 MLJ 1 [2015] 2 MLJ 441 [2016] 2 MLJ 428 [2016] 4 CLJ 665 [2018] 1 AMR 517 [2018] 2 CLJ 641 [2018] 2 MLJ 177 [2020] 1 MLJ 689 [2020] 10 CLJ 1 [2020] 12 MLJ 67 [2020] 8 AMR 227 [2021] 3 MLJ 622 [2021] 4 CLJ 821

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pa-11bncvc-5-07-2025)