Maiden Heritage Empire Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tungku Herba Mathika Enterprise 2. ) Nurr Ayu Athika Binti Mohd Rodzi 3. ) Mahani Binti Manab

pa-22ip-2-12-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 March 2025 • PA-22IP-2-12/2020 • 32 min read
14 cases cited (0 SG, 14 foreign)

Catchwords

Tuntutan Plaintif terhadap Defendan-Defendan adalah atas perlanggaran Harta Intelek milik Plaintif, di mana Defendan-Defendan didakwa telah mempromosikan, menjual dan/atau mengedar produk Defendan Pertama yang mempunyai persamaan yang ketara dengan produk Plaintif melalui platform media sosial serta platform e-dagang di seluruh Malaysia tanpa sebarang kebenaran, persetujuan dan/atau pelesenan daripada Plaintif. Defendan-Defendan melalui Tuntutan Balas telah memohon agar paten Plaintif dibatalkan atas alasan tidak mematuhi keperluan di bawah Seksyen 11, 12, 13 dan 14 Akta Paten 1983, serta menuntut ganti rugi atas dakwaan fitnah berikutan beberapa penerbitan berunsur fitnah yang didakwa dilakukan oleh Plaintif.

Judges (1)

Rozana binti Ali Yusoff Delivered

Counsel (5)

Hafiz Zubir, Athirah & Co. Firm Vaasu & Yannis Neoh Firm Ahmad Hafiz bin Zubir Counsel Defendant Iman Danial Hakim bin Md Azam Counsel Defendant Teh Yi Kai Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

Maiden Heritage Empire Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Tungku Herba Mathika Enterprise Defendant Mahani binti Manab Defendant Nurr Ayu Athika binti Mohd Rodzi Defendant

Case Significance

Maiden Heritage Empire Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tungku Herba Mathika Enterprise 2. ) Nu... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 18, 2025 (citation: pa-22ip-2-12-2020). The case was decided by Rozana binti Ali Yusoff.

What was the outcome of Maiden Heritage Empire Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tungku Herba Mathika Enterprise 2. ) Nu...?

Maiden Heritage Empire Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tungku Herba Mathika Enterprise 2. ) Nu... is a High Court decision dated March 18, 2025. The case was heard by Rozana binti Ali Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
s 6

Cases Cited (14)

MY (14)
[1973] 1 MLRH 153 [1973] 2 MLJ 56 [1995] 4 MLRH 877 [1996] 2 MLJ 62 [1999] 1 CLJ 461 [2009] 4 CLJ 113 [2010] 5 CLJ 32 [2010] 5 MLJ 394 [2014] 6 CLJ 904 [2016] 2 CLJ 414 [2019] 4 CLJ 301 [2020] 3 MLJ 482 [2021] 2 MLJ 652 [2021] 3 CLJ 603

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pa-22ip-2-12-2020)