CH'NG JOO HIN v 1. ) CHOONG SEK AUN 2. ) CHEW JU LI 3. ) JOYCELYN HENG WEI LIN 4. ) CH'NG BEE YONG
Catchwords
Conclusion In summary, this Court has considered all relevant legal principles, even those not explicitly mentioned, while evaluating the various issues presented during the trial. On the balance of probabilities, the Plaintiff has failed to prove the case and refute the evidence presented by the First Defendant that: (a) the Testatrix gave instructions directly to SD3; (b) the Will was explained clause by clause in Hokkien; (c) the Testatrix was alert, responsive, and coherent; (d) the Will was executed before independent legal witnesses; and (e) there is no evidence of coercion, pressure, or domination. Therefore, the Plaintiffs’ claim is dismissed with the costs of RM30,000.00 to be paid to the First Defendant and subject to allocator fees.
Judges (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (pa-22ncvc-247-12-2020)