Parimala Devi A/p Thangamoney v Theyagarajan A/l Muniandy

pa-22ncvc-33-02-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 April 2025 • PA-22NCvC-33-02/2020 • 17 min read

13 cases cited (0 SG, 13 foreign)

Catchwords

Saya berpendapat bahawa isu utama yang perlu diputuskan oleh Mahkamah dalam kes ini adalah sama ada SPA bertarikh 3.7.2017 merupakan: [a] Satu perjanjian jual beli yang sah dan berkuatkuasa di sisi undang-undang, yang melibatkan penjualan hartanah oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif; atau [b] Sebenarnya merupakan suatu transaksi pinjaman wang yang tidak sah, iaitu suatu pinjaman wang tanpa lesen yang melanggar peruntukan undang-undang berkaitan pinjaman wang berlesen.

Judges (1)

Rozana binti Ali Yusoff Delivered

Counsel (4)

Vaasu & Yannis Neoh Firm Yagoo & Assoc. Firm Vaasudevan Puspagaran Counsel Defendant Yagoo Subramaniam Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

Parimala Devi a/p Thangamoney Plaintiff Theyagarajan a/l Muniandy Defendant

Case Significance

Parimala Devi A/p Thangamoney v Theyagarajan A/l Muniandy is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 22, 2025 (citation: pa-22ncvc-33-02-2020). The case was decided by Rozana binti Ali Yusoff.

What was the outcome of Parimala Devi A/p Thangamoney v Theyagarajan A/l Muniandy?

Parimala Devi A/p Thangamoney v Theyagarajan A/l Muniandy is a High Court decision dated April 22, 2025. The case was heard by Rozana binti Ali Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (13)

UK (2)

[1934] 2 KB 394 [1990] 3 All ER 376

MY (11)

[1993] 2 CLJ 640 [1994] 3 CLJ 806 [1994] 3 MLJ 127 [1995] 3 MLRH 197 [1995] 4 CLJ 670 [2001] 3 CLJ 661 [2001] 4 MLJ 86 [2012] 1 MLJ 761 [2012] 2 CLJ 16 [2023] 10 CLJ 733 [2024] 1 MLJ 755

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pa-22ncvc-33-02-2020)