1. ) THINAKARAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN 2. ) KASTHURI A/P SANTHIRA SEGARAN v 1. ) RAJESWARY A/P PERUMAL 2. ) GOBINATHAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN

pa-22ncvc-49-04-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 August 2025 • PA-22NCvC-49-04/2025

Catchwords

Striking out – Plaintiffs seek to revoke the letters of administration granted to their mother and to remove her as administrator – Plaintiffs failed to issue a citation under Order 72 rule 2(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 – Whether such failure is fatal to the action – Whether the plaintiffs’ claim for salaries as directors of the family company should be made against the company, and not against the defendants – Whether the plaintiffs should be given permission to manage the family company – Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to motor vehicles belonging to the estate of the deceased.

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Parties (4)

Gobinathan a/l Santhira Segaran Defendant Kasthuri a/p Santhira Segaran Plaintiff Rajeswary a/p Perumal Defendant Thinakaran a/l Santhira Segaran Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) THINAKARAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN 2. ) KASTHURI A/P SANTHIRA SEGARAN v 1. ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 18, 2025 (citation: pa-22ncvc-49-04-2025). The case was decided by Quay Chew Soon.

What was the outcome of 1. ) THINAKARAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN 2. ) KASTHURI A/P SANTHIRA SEGARAN v 1. ...?

1. ) THINAKARAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN 2. ) KASTHURI A/P SANTHIRA SEGARAN v 1. ... is a High Court decision dated August 18, 2025. The case was heard by Quay Chew Soon. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pa-22ncvc-49-04-2025)