Soh Phei Ching v 1. ) WM Wellmax Marketing Sdn Bhd 2. ) Heng Hua Kian 3. ) Heng Seng Soo

pa-24ncc-21-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 9 February 2026 • PA-24NCC-21-05/2025 • 6 min read

6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

Application to vary the Consent Judgment. Defendants has failed to provide any basis to disturb the Consent Judgment. No evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. The proposed variation constitutes a substantive change to the core terms, not a clerical correction. Court cannot rewrite a contract authored by the parties themselves. The sanctity of a Consent Judgment must be upheld to ensure the finality of litigation.

Judges (1)

Rozana binti Ali Yusoff Delivered

Counsel (4)

Ghandi Firm Kah Sheng & Co. Firm Jason Cheong Kah Lok Counsel Plaintiff Koay Chun Hian Counsel Defendant

Parties (4)

WM Wellmax Marketing Sdn Bhd Respondent Heng Hua Kian Respondent Heng Seng Soo Respondent Soh Phei Ching Applicant

Cases Cited (6)

MY (6)

[1971] 2 MLJ 75 [1981] 2 MLJ 145 [2004] 2 CLJ 301 [2004] 3 MLJ 465 [2016] 6 CLJ 368 [2022] 4 CLJ 248

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pa-24ncc-21-05-2025)