VEO Industrial Sdn Bhd v Sing Long Corporation Limited
Catchwords
1. The Amended Originating Summons in Enclosure 15 is, in substance, the Plaintiff’s application for a Fortuna Injunction. 2. At the conclusion of the hearing of Enclosure 15 on 28 October 2025, this Court allowed the main relief sought by the Plaintiff but dismissed the alternative relief. In particular, the Court declined to grant the Plaintiff’s alternative prayer for general damages, aggravated damages and/or exemplary and/or punitive damages to be fixed and/or assessed by the Court and to be paid immediately by the Defendant. 3. Being dissatisfied with the said decision dated 28 October 2025, the Defendant filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal on 25 November 2025. 4. These are the grounds of judgment of this Court in allowing the main relief sought by the Plaintiff. The Superseding Issue 5. The overarching issue for determination is whether this is an appropriate case for this Court to exercise its discretion to grant a Fortuna Injunction. Central to that inquiry is the characterisation of the debt relied upon in the Statutory Notice, namely, whether it is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds or remains undisputed.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
VEO Industrial Sdn Bhd v Sing Long Corporation Limited is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 27, 2025 (citation: pa-24ncc-23-06-2025). The case was decided by Choong Yeow Choy.
Key issues: 1. The Amended Originating Summons in Enclosure 15 is, in substance, the Plaintiff’s application for a Fortuna Injunction..
What was the outcome of VEO Industrial Sdn Bhd v Sing Long Corporation Limited?
VEO Industrial Sdn Bhd v Sing Long Corporation Limited is a High Court decision dated October 27, 2025. The case was heard by Choong Yeow Choy. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (pa-24ncc-23-06-2025)