PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH 1. ) VILVA NATHAN A/L SURIANMURTY 2. ) CHAKRA WARTHI A/L PANNIR SELVAN 3. ) PUTERI MURNI

pb-45a-48-07-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 June 2025 • PB-45A-48-07/2021 • 18 min read

4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Pertuduhan di bawah seksyen 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 [Akta 234] - Dadah dijumpai di dalam sebuah rumah – siapakah penghuni rumah – lokasi OKT1 ditangkap berbeza dengan lokasi rumah tempat dadah ditemui - Sama ada ketiga-tiga OKT mempunyai keupayaan untuk berurusan dengan dadah dengan mengecualikan akses orang lain - Sama ada ketiga-tiga OKT mempunyai kawalan dan jagaan serta pengetahuan mengenai dadah – sama ada siasatan yang lengkap telah dijalankan – sama ada ketiga-tiga OKT mempunyai niat bersama - Sama ada anggapan pengedaran dadah di bawah seksyen 37(da) Akta 234 terpakai.

Judges (1)

Fathiyah binti Idris Delivered

Counsel (6)

Anba & Associates Firm Hussaini & Co Firm Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Pulau Pinang Firm Anbananthan a/l Yathiraju Counsel Accused Che Rohana binti Ismail Counsel Prosecution Hussaini bin Abdul Rashid Counsel Accused

Parties (4)

Pendakwa Raya Prosecutor Chakra Warthi a/l Pannir Selvan Accused Puteri Murni Accused Vilva Nathan a/l Surianmurty Accused

Case Significance

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH 1. ) VILVA NATH... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 10, 2025 (citation: pb-45a-48-07-2021). The case was decided by Fathiyah binti Idris.

What was the outcome of PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH 1. ) VILVA NATH...?

PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] TERTUDUH 1. ) VILVA NATH... is a High Court decision dated June 10, 2025. The case was heard by Fathiyah binti Idris. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)

[1956] 22 MLJ 237 [1988] 2 CLJ 170 [2006] 1 CLJ 457 [2010] 1 CLJ 685

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (pb-45a-48-07-2021)