Mohd Hasral Bin Abu Hassan v 1. ) Salmah Binti Mohd Noor 2. ) Amar Musafir Holdings Sdn Bhd

ra-23ncvc-1-04-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 November 2024 • RA-23NCvC-1-04/2022 • 16 min read

11 cases cited (1 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

Tort Pencerobohan tanah - seksyen 101 Keterangan 1950 [Akta 56] - specific performance - pemindahan milik tanpa persetujuan orang berkepentingan - the onus of proof of any particular fact lies on the party who alleges it, not on him who denies it - bukan pembeli yang bona fide - penjualan unilateral tanpa kebenaran - Hak dan kepentingan kontraktual - Pembatalan pindahmilik - Pemilikan di bawah umur (minor interest) - Quare clausum fregit - Constructive Knowledge - Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - Pengosongan hartanah -Hak proprietari - Larangan menafikan kepentingan - Seksyen 102 Akta Keterangan 1950 [Akta 56] - Imbangan Kebarangkalian -

Judges (1)

Arik Sanusi bin Yeop Johari Delivered

Counsel (6)

Mukmin Azmi & Co Firm Nith Gowri Lachman & Partners Firm Rajadevan & Associates Firm Ahmad Mukmin Aimi Bin Azmi Counsel Plaintiff Fathin Delila Binti Hamdan Counsel Defendant Ramesh A/L Lachmanan Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

Amar Musafir Holdings Sdn Bhd Defendant Mohd Hasral bin Abu Hassan Plaintiff Salmah binti Mohd Noor Defendant

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act

s 101

Cases Cited (11)

SLR (1)

[2007] 4 SLR 855

UK (1)

[1927] 1 Ch 367

MY (7)

[1980] 2 MLJ 86 [1998] 2 CLJ 740 [2006] 3 MLRH 443 [2006] 6 MLJ 24 [2017] 3 MLJ 281 [2017] 4 MLJ 697 [2017] 5 MLJ 398

IN (2)

AIR 1961 SC 1474 AIR 1964 SC 136

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ra-23ncvc-1-04-2022)